After Hours Conversation - Peter Mühlhäusler: The Dangers of "Blitz-Krieg" Fieldwork and the Virtues of Slow Research
Oct 21, 2015
from 07:30 PM to 08:00 PM
|Where||FRIAS, Albertstr. 19, Lounge|
|Contact Name||Nikolaus Binder|
|Contact Phone||+49 (0)761 203-97398|
nach Einladung / by invitation
|Add event to calendar||
A significant but indeterminate number of approaches to linguistics have been labelled “paradigm” on the grounds of
- redefinition of the object of investigation
- new research questions
- new methods
- new terminology
Many of these claimed new paradigms have failed to attract a critical mass of scholars. Such instances of paradigm shifts that were successful owe their success to socio-historical contingencies rather than their being superior ways of capturing the nature of human language. Importantly, paradigm shift in linguistics is constrained by a body of Western metalinguistic beliefs, deeply entrenched metaphors of communication, and the expectations of the bodies funding, disseminating and benefiting from linguistic research.
A convenient survey of what the vast majority of linguists believe about language is given by Richard Hudson (1981) in “Some issues on which linguists can agree”.